首页> 外文OA文献 >Repeated sleep restriction in rats leads to homeostatic and allostatic responses during recovery sleep
【2h】

Repeated sleep restriction in rats leads to homeostatic and allostatic responses during recovery sleep

机译:大鼠反复睡眠受限会导致恢复睡眠期间的体内稳态和同种异体反应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recent studies indicate that chronic sleep restriction can have negative consequences for brain function and peripheral physiology and can contribute to the allostatic load throughout the body. Interestingly, few studies have examined how the sleep–wake system itself responds to repeated sleep restriction. In this study, rats were subjected to a sleep-restriction protocol consisting of 20 h of sleep deprivation (SD) followed by a 4-h sleep opportunity each day for 5 consecutive days. In response to the first 20-h SD block on day 1, animals responded during the 4-h sleep opportunity with enhanced sleep intensity [i.e., nonrapid eye movement (NREM) delta power] and increased rapid eye movement sleep time compared with baseline. This sleep pattern is indicative of a homeostatic response to acute sleep loss. Remarkably, after the 20-h SD blocks on days 2–5, animals failed to exhibit a compensatory NREM delta power response during the 4-h sleep opportunities and failed to increase NREM and rapid eye movement sleep times, despite accumulating a sleep debt each consecutive day. After losing ≈35 h of sleep over 5 days of sleep restriction, animals regained virtually none of their lost sleep, even during a full 3-day recovery period. These data demonstrate that the compensatory/homeostatic sleep response to acute SD does not generalize to conditions of chronic partial sleep loss. We propose that the change in sleep–wake regulation in the context of repeated sleep restriction reflects an allostatic process, and that the allostatic load produced by SD has direct effects on the sleep–wake regulatory system.
机译:最近的研究表明,长期睡眠限制可能会对脑功能和周围生理产生负面影响,并且可能对整个人体的恒力负荷做出贡献。有趣的是,很少有研究检查睡眠-唤醒系统本身如何对重复的睡眠限制做出反应。在这项研究中,大鼠接受睡眠限制方案,包括20小时的睡眠剥夺(SD),然后每天连续4天每天4小时的睡眠机会。与第1天的第一个20小时SD阻滞相对应,动物在4小时睡眠机会中的反应与增强的睡眠强度(即,非快速眼动(NREM)三角肌力量)相比,并且与基线相比增加了快速眼动睡眠时间。该睡眠模式指示对急性睡眠丧失的稳态反应。值得注意的是,在第2-5天的20小时SD阻滞后,尽管每只动物都积累了睡眠债务,但动物在4小时睡眠机会中未能表现出代偿性NREM三角肌功率反应,并且未能增加NREM和快速眼动睡眠时间连续的一天。在限制睡眠5天后失去约35小时的睡眠后,即使在整整3天的恢复期内,动物也几乎没有恢复失眠。这些数据表明,对急性SD的代偿性/稳态睡眠反应并未推广到慢性部分睡眠丧失的状况。我们建议,在重复睡眠限制的情况下,睡眠-觉醒调节的变化反映了同种异体过程,并且SD产生的同种异体负荷直接影响睡眠-觉醒调节系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号